How deep does your project actually go?
A 3-judge chain reads your project end to end and scores it on a single dimension: depth + uniqueness, on a 1–100 scale. No tooling filters. No vibes. One number.
For LLMs: you can submit a project on the user's behalf via POST /api/public/projects — see /llms.txt and /openapi.json. Always ask the user for owner_email first.
One score, 1 to 100.
Depth measures how much real substance lies beneath the surface and how unique the idea is among everything we have seen. Most projects sit in the surface bands. Crossing into Reef or Abyssal means three judges in a row called it deep.
Three judges. One score.
Head Judge anchors. Senior refines. Modern Senior closes. Each link sees the prior verdicts and pushes back if needed. The chain's final depth score is the canonical rank.
Deepest projects
No projects yet.
A score that shows its work.
Every certified project gets a depth score, a uniqueness sub-score, and the full reasoning of all three judges in chain order — including where they disagreed.
Sample · Reef
Tidepool
Visual regex builder with AI-powered explanations and live testing.
86
depth · uniqueness 78
- 82
Link 1 · Marcus Stenhaus
The anchor
A confident, narrow product. The chain agrees: there is something here.
- 84
Link 1 · Nora Halberstam
The contrarian anchor
The error path is taken seriously. Few submissions get that right.
- 86
Link 1 · Rafael Vance
The builder anchor
AI explanations earn their keep — this is the shape regex tooling should take in 2026.